Adobe 5.5 Design Standard Manual de usuario Pagina 59

  • Descarga
  • Añadir a mis manuales
  • Imprimir
  • Pagina
    / 140
  • Tabla de contenidos
  • MARCADORES
  • Valorado. / 5. Basado en revisión del cliente
Vista de pagina 58
G G
Adobe Creative Suite 5 Printing Guide 57
expressed in pixels per inch (ppi). The higher the resolution of an image
that’s a given size, the more detail that can be displayed.
36 ppi: 128 KB 72 ppi: 236 KB 300 ppi: 2.2 MB
Upsampling: Resolution increased
to 300 ppi from 72 ppi.
Image Resolution
e higher the number of the pixels per inch (ppi), the more
detail an image can display. More pixels per inch also means
larger image size. Increasing the resolution, or upsampling,
from 72 ppi to 300 ppi in Photoshop does not recreate
missing information. Note the soening of detail in the image
that has been upsampled in Photoshop, compared to an
image scanned to the correct size at the 300-ppi resolution.
The appropriate resolution for an image to be printed, based on the
final line screen, is 1.5 to 2 times the line screen, at or above its final
size. For example, an image to be printed at 150 lines per inch (lpi)
should be scanned to final size with a resolution of 225 ppi to 300 ppi.
There is no advantage to exceeding 300 ppi for an image to be printed
at 150 lpi; the excess information incurs unnecessary processing with
no visual improvement. Rather than do the math, most users elect to
use 300 ppi as a general target resolution.
It’s important to emphasize that, whatever the target resolution, the
image must be scanned (or photographed digitally) at or above its final
printing size. That is, an image intended to print at a size of 5 x 7 inches
and a line screen of 150 lpi should be scanned to 5 x 7 inches at 300
ppi. Scanning an image at 300 ppi, but at a size of 2 x 3 inches, with the
intention of scaling up the image to the correct final size of 5 x 7 inches
(either in Photoshop or in a page layout program), will compromise
detail after resizing. Photoshop can interpolate information, but this
results in the program’s “best guess” approximation of the missing
pixels. There is no substitute for a correctly sized original image of the
proper resolution.
Compared to scaling up, scaling down an image is less likely to produce
obvious loss of detail, whether the scaling is done in Photoshop,
Illustrator, or InDesign. Even though image data will be discarded, the
smaller size camouflages the loss. Plus, if you use the Bicubic Sharper
method in Photoshop when scaling down the size of an image (which is
recommended; this is discussed in the following topic), slight edge
sharpening is applied to compensate visually for the discarded data.
Actual versus Effective resolution
The best approach to image creation (whether scanning or shooting a
digital photograph) is to have the image at the proper size and
resolution before using it in other applications (or printing directly from
Photoshop). Generally, if you start with an image that is 300 ppi at a
given size, you have some leeway; scaling up to 125% in a page layout
probably won’t degrade detail in an obvious way. An image without
much detail (such as a background shot of a soft, gauzy sky) could still
be acceptable if scaled up to 150% in a page layout. An image with a
resolution of 300 ppi that is scaled up to 200% in an InDesign or
Illustrator document has an effective resolution of 150 ppi. In other
words, scaling an image up in InDesign decreases the resolution, and
scaling an image down in InDesign increases the resolution. Conversely,
a 300-ppi image that is scaled down to 50% has an effective resolution
of 600 ppi. Scaling down images in InDesign or Illustrator does not
reduce the amount of information included in an exported PDF, or an
outgoing print stream, as no pixels are actually discarded. Processing
time may increase slightly in the RIP. If just a few images are scaled
Vista de pagina 58
1 2 ... 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 ... 139 140

Comentarios a estos manuales

Sin comentarios